Why the early Greens said: “Neither left nor right”

Following up on my last post (“Toward a constructive praxis based on a positive vision”) re: life here on Turtle Island circa 1491 vs. life here in America in 2021 . . .

It’s not a question of “going back” or (as John Zerzan seems to imply) “deconstructing it all.” It’s a question of recognizing how profound the difference has been between the two distinctive human lifeways and then — upon deeply contemplating what it means in terms of where we’ve been and where we’re going — re-considering “progress” and re-directing our pathways forward.

Naturally, we don’t want to jettison things associated with the “New Ways” that can lead to a better quality of life and can be sustainable. David Watson calls for a “synthesis of the primitive and the modern.”

But it may very well look more like the former than the latter.

Leftists: Rather than thinking in terms of a “new system,” think in terms of new lifeways.

Radicals: Talk about a radically new direction for humanity.

Greens: We should stick to our slogan, “Neither Left nor Right, but Out in Front.” Recall how one of our founding thinkers, Edward Goldsmith, identified as a conservative with a small ‘c’. He had no love for big government any more than for big business or big cities or leviathan-scale technology. He said we need to slow down, scale down, and decentralize; live more lightly and more locally. Our Ten Key Values originally derived from that kind of eco-communitarian worldview.

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Steven Welzer

The editor of Green Horizon Magazine, Steve has been a movement activist for many years (he was an original co-editor of DSA’s “Ecosocialist Review”).